A novel Y-shaper and chopper for small pupil management in cataract surgery: The initial experience

Small pupil is a well-known risk factor for causing cataract surgery complications such as vitreous loss, anterior capsular tear, increased inflammation, and an irregular pupil shape. Because all currently available pharmacological approaches of dilating the pupil before or during cataract surgery cannot guarantee the result, the surgeon sometimes resorts to the use of mechanical pupil-expanding devices. However, these devices can increase the overall surgical cost and operative time. Very frequently, a combination of the two is needed; thus, we present the Y-shaped chopper designed by the authors, which serves the purpose of managing the intra-operative miosis and allows simultaneous nuclear emulsification.

Comparison of three techniques of harvesting full-thickness retinal tissue for large or persistent macular holes

Purpose: To evaluate the success rate of autologous retinal graft (ARG) for the closure of full?thickness macular holes (MHs) and compare the outcomes of three different techniques of harvesting the graft. Methods: Clinic files of all patients who had undergone ARG for MH using intraocular scissors, membrane loop, or retinal punch to harvest retinal tissue were retrospectively reviewed. All patients were evaluated for MH closure, retinal reattachment, and visual improvement. Results: Twenty?two eyes of 22 patients were included. ARG was done for 16 eyes (72.7%) with failed, large persistent MH, and six eyes (27.3%) also underwent simultaneous repair of retinal detachment. The basal diameter of MH was 1103.67 ± 310.09 (range 650–1529) ?m. Intraocular scissors were used in 10 eyes (45.5%), a membrane loop in five eyes (22.7%), and a retinal punch in seven eyes (31.8%). Silicone oil tamponade was used in seven (31.8%) eyes and gas in 15 (68.1%) eyes. The follow?up ranged from 6 to 18 months. The hole closure rate was 72.7% (16/22). Visual improvement was noted in 18 eyes (81.8%). Retinal reattachment was seen in all eyes. Good graft integration with the surrounding area was seen in 17 eyes (77.3%). Graft retraction was seen in four eyes (18.18%) and graft loss in one eye (4.55%). No significant differences were noted among the three groups. Conclusion: ARG is successful in closing large, failed MH with and without retinal detachment. A membrane loop and retinal punch are equally useful in harvesting the graft, but scissors are preferable in case the retina is detached. With all three techniques, integration of the graft with the surrounding tissue can be achieved

To evaluate the functional and anatomical outcomes for autologous retinal autograft with Finesse™ Flex Loop for failed macular holes

Purpose: To evaluate the functional and anatomical outcomes for autologous retinal autograft with Finesse™ Flex Loop for failed macular holes. Methods: This is a retrospective study analyzing medical records of consecutive patients with refractory macular hole (at least 1 prior surgery) and eyes with retinal detachment with coexisting macular holes (MH). Optical coherence tomography (OCT) of the macula was performed before and after surgery. The primary study outcome evaluated were the functional and anatomic macular hole closure, and secondary outcomes were improvement in visual acuity and restoration of the outer retinal bands, external limiting membrane, and ellipsoid zone in eyes with acquisition of autologous retinal transplant using Finesse Loop. Results: The study included eight eyes of eight patients; retinal autograft was performed in six (75.0%) and autologous retinal transplantation (ART) with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) was performed in two (25.0%) eyes. The average MH basal diameter in the study was 1310.88 ± 138.63 ?m. The successful hole closure rate was observed to be 75% (6 eyes) and 100% retinal reattachment was observed in ART with RRD. Statistically significant (P = 0.001) improvement was noted for preop and postop visual acuity gain for ART acquisition and postop macular hole closure. The restoration of the external limiting membrane (ELM) and ellipsoid zone (EZ) was observed in 37.5% (3 eyes) of patients. Conclusion: Finesse™ Flex Loop can be used to harvest retinal tissue and it provides good anatomical and functional outcomes for failed macular hole.

Comparison of patient satisfaction with red-free (green) versus yellow light using binocular indirect ophthalmoscope for retinal examination

Purpose: Comparison of patient satisfaction with red?free (green) versus yellow light using binocular indirect ophthalmoscope for retinal examination. Methods: This is an observational questionnaire?based study of 100 myopes in the age group of 18–40 years coming for a routine check?up or for refractive surgery workup. The examination was done using an indirect ophthalmoscope and a 20D lens with green or yellow light and was assigned in two groups randomly using the coin toss method, following which, a questionnaire was used to assess the following parameters: a) level of comfort, b) any complaints of discomfort during examination, d) preference of the used light source in future, e) grading of discomfort on a linear scale, and f) patient cooperation and duration of examination. Results: Patients were randomized for observation with IDO using either green light (n = 55) or yellow light (n = 45) filter. In the study, 46 patients (83.6%) were very comfortable and only 9 patients (16.4%) experienced mild discomfort when using red?free (green) light, while only 3 patients (6.7%) were very comfortable and 31 (68.9%) had mild discomfort when using yellow light. The complaints of watering with yellow and green light were noted in 36 patients (80.0%) and 15 patients (27.3%), pain in 13 patients (28.9%) and 3 patients (5.5%), light sensitivity in 29 patients (64.4%) and 4 patients (7.3%), respectively, all being significantly more in yellow light category (P < 0.001). The time of examination was significantly more in yellow light category with 83 ± 10.75 seconds (P < 0.001). Conclusion: Retinal examination using the green filter of indirect ophthalmoscope is more comfortable in examining the patients as compared to routine yellow light with decreased number of complaints, lesser examination time, and better patient cooperation.

Biopsy techniques for intraocular tumors.

Biopsy involves the surgical removal of a tissue specimen for histopathologic evaluation. Most intraocular tumors are reliably diagnosed based on the clinical evaluation or with noninvasive diagnostic techniques. However, accurately diagnosing a small percentage of tumors can be challenging. A tissue biopsy is thus needed to establish a definitive diagnosis and plan the requisite treatment. From fine‑needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) to surgical excision, all tissue collection techniques have been studied in the literature. Each technique has its indications and limitations. FNAB has been reported to provide for 88–95% reliable and safe ophthalmic tumor diagnosis and has gained popularity for prognostic purposes and providing eye conserving treatment surgeries. The technique and instrumentation for biopsy vary depending upon the tissue involved (retina, choroid, subretinal space, vitreous, and aqueous), suspected diagnosis, size, location, associated retinal detachment, and clarity of the media. The cytopathologist confers a very important role in diagnosis and their assistance plays a key role in managing and planning the treatment for malignancies.